← All decks

Orthopaedics

Periprosthetic Fractures

Built from Orthopedic Trauma Essentials

What’s inside

6 sections · 86 slides

  1. 01

    Fractures around an implant

    What these injuries are, why they are increasing, and the words used to describe them.

    • A broken bone that already has metal in it
    • Why we are seeing more of them
    • Four things decide what you do
    • A good classification does a job
    • Hip replacement on a plain radiograph
    • Knee replacement on a plain radiograph
    • The short forms used throughout
    • More short forms you will meet
    • Two more terms worth defining now

    9 slides

  2. 02

    Classifying the fracture

    Vancouver and the Unified Classification System around the hip; Rorabeck-Taylor and Felix around the knee.

    • What the hip systems are built on
    • Vancouver: three places a hip fracture can sit
    • Type B splits by stem and by bone
    • What each type B subtype means for surgery
    • Fracture around a hip stem before treatment
    • From Vancouver to a system for every joint
    • Unified Classification System (UCS) for the femur
    • The letters Vancouver never had
    • Where the two systems agree and differ
    • UCS compared with the Vancouver classification
    • Femoral shaft fracture below the tip of a hip stem
    • How reliable are these labels in practice?
    • Bone loss around a loose femoral stem
    • Radiographs alone will not settle stability
    • The decision sequence to run every time
    • Reading the sequence
    • Around the knee, different names, same logic
    • What the two knee systems actually measure
    • One table for all three regions
    • Commonly used periprosthetic fracture classification systems and decision variables
    • Decision pathway for a fracture around a hip stem
    • Section summary: classification is stability-driven

    22 slides

  3. 03

    Vancouver B2: fix it or revise it?

    A loose stem with good bone. The classic answer is revision, but the evidence now supports a second pathway in selected patients.

    • What a B2 fracture is
    • The standard answer
    • Why the question reopened
    • Evidence: the 2022 systematic review
    • Evidence: the 2021 JBJS Reviews analysis
    • Evidence: the most recent synthesis
    • Evidence: cemented polished taper-slip stems
    • What all four studies are really saying
    • The point is not abandoning revision
    • Two pathways, chosen by the patient in front of you
    • The same fracture after fixation with cables
    • Use the table as a bedside checklist
    • Practical decision points for ORIF versus revision in Vancouver B2 fractures
    • Section summary: a dual-pathway approach

    14 slides

  4. 04

    Distal femur fractures after knee replacement

    Osteoporotic bone, a frail patient and a metal cap in the way. Plate, nail, augment or replace?

    • Why these fractures are difficult
    • Three questions decide fix versus replace
    • Reading those three questions
    • The four options on the table
    • Evidence: comparing all three main strategies
    • Evidence: plate versus nail for healing
    • Evidence: replacement against fixation
    • What 'medical complications' meant here
    • Evidence: another look at DFR versus fixation
    • KSS 80
    • Reading those DFR numbers honestly
    • Metal segment replacing the lower femur
    • When one plate is not enough
    • Match the method to the indication
    • How to choose between plate and nail
    • Take the table row by row
    • Evidence signals across PDFF strategies after TKA
    • Section summary: indication-based, not fashion-based

    18 slides

  5. 05

    Fractures caught between two implants

    Interprosthetic femoral fractures: a hip stem above, a knee stem below, and a short stretch of poor bone in between.

    • A femur with metal at both ends
    • Why this segment is so unforgiving
    • Unpacking the mechanics
    • The founding principles
    • Evidence: what actually goes wrong
    • If it does not heal
    • Why recommendations are principle-based
    • What those principles ask you to do
    • When the bone is nearly gone
    • Work the checklist before the incision
    • Interprosthetic femoral fracture planning checklist
    • Section summary: treat it as a two-implant problem

    12 slides

  6. 06

    Pulling it together

    The threads that run through every periprosthetic fracture decision.

    • One question sits above all the others
    • What the pooled evidence keeps repeating
    • Five rules to carry into theatre
    • Three settings, three default answers
    • Where the evidence is still thin
    • References
    • References (continued)
    • References (continued)
    • References (continued)
    • References (continued)
    • Orthopedic Trauma Essentials 2026

    11 slides